

The NFL recently relaxed the restrictions on Tom Brady, allowing the retired quarterback and Fox Sports analyst to fully engage in team game-planning sessions despite owning a minority of the Las Vegas Raiders.
The reversal has raised arguments throughout the league regarding broadcast access, ownership disputes, and upholding integrity in professional football.
Tom Brady makes first public practice appearance with the Raiders since becoming minority owner
What happened first?
Brady signed a 10-year, $375 million contract with Fox Sports in 2024 to begin the next chapter of his life after his NFL career. Sometime later, he bought a 5% share in the Raiders, prompting the NFL to impose limitations on his access to team information.
Under the initial restriction, Brady was not allowed to attend team production meetings and gain access to the training center, which would limit his capacity to provide detailed commentary.
The NFL reversal
Now, in August 2025, the NFL relaxed some of these limitations so that Brady can join production meetings remotely or face-to-face, how he pleases. He is still not allowed to access to training centers or team practice observation, upholding competitive integrity with increased access for broadcasting.
On Monday, Tom Brady gave his opinion and his perspective about the whole situation during an interview with PFF’s Chris Collinsworth.Brady could not hide his happiness and was thrilled to witness the amendment made, crediting it to enhancing his capability to provide effective analysis to fans.
I just want to gain insight into the game to help the viewers understand it better. Cause I love the NFL, I love the sport. If I can communicate that in a positive way to the viewers, great
He also mentioned that even though he has been using publicly available content such as press conferences before, now that he can engage with participation in production meetings, he will provide a more sophisticated viewpoint during his broadcasts.
The industry reacts to the removal
The decision has drawn many different reactions. There are some critics who disagree that Brady’s dual positions as broadcaster and team owner would present conflict of interest situations, but others feel the league was justified in offering access to meetings but still limiting physical team presence.
Commentators add that the ruling provides a big precedent for subsequent cases where media functions collide with team ownership, evidencing the league’s new disposition towards openness and fairness.
For fans though, the NFL change means more informed broadcasts with improved analysis by Brady. For the league, it proves commitment towards achieving professional ethics with the fact of retired players pursuing media and ownership functions.
This news was originally published on this post .
Be the first to leave a comment