- A multi-level evaluation of the WR position: PFF runs nearly a dozen distinct data collection processes, and several of them are dedicated to evaluating wide receivers. That includes detailed tracking of route types, route nuances and separation on a per-play basis. When combined with our play-by-play grading, these layers of data come together to create one of the most comprehensive receiver databases in football.
- The root of the grading system: Each player starts every snap with a baseline grade of 0, awarded when they do exactly what’s expected on that play. From there, grades move in 0.5-point increments — positive or negative — based on how much the player’s performance exceeds or falls short of those expectations.

Welcome to part three of our series on how PFF grades every position on every play. This time, we’re turning our focus to wide receivers.
If you missed the earlier installments on how we grade quarterbacks or running backs on a play-by-play basis, it’s worth revisiting those to understand the foundational principles behind our system.
To quickly recap: at the heart of PFF’s grading lies the concept of expectation. Each player starts every snap with a baseline grade of 0, awarded when they do exactly what’s expected on that play. From there, grades move in 0.5-point increments — positive or negative — based on how much the player’s performance exceeds or falls short of those expectations. It’s a simple but powerful framework that forms the foundation of every PFF grade you see.
How does that work for receivers?
PFF runs nearly a dozen distinct data collection processes, and several of them are dedicated to evaluating wide receivers. That includes detailed tracking of route types, route nuances and separation on a per-play basis. When combined with our play-by-play grading, these layers of data come together to create one of the most comprehensive receiver databases in football — rich with context, depth and insight into how players win at the position.
Did the receiver create separation with sharp route-running or pure speed, or did he benefit from a defensive back slipping or blowing the coverage? Did he make an exceptional catch in a tight window, or did he make a routine play harder than it needed to be? Did he convert a key first down, or leave one on the field? Did he go down immediately after the catch, or did he force missed tackles and create explosive plays?
It’s never just about the stat line. It’s about the performance behind it.
That’s why a receiver can earn a higher grade on an 18-yard sideline toe-tap than on a 40-yard touchdown. If a coverage bust leaves a receiver wide open with nothing more to do than catch and coast into the end zone, that play won’t grade as highly as a short catch turned into a big gain through broken tackles or elite acceleration.
A look at positively graded play rate
As we did in our quarterback and running back breakdowns, we’ll now examine wide receiver performance from the 2024 NFL regular season using positive grade rate, a metric that highlights how often a player earns any level of positive grade while on the field.
Let’s start with the raw positive grade rate: how often receivers are making impactful plays worthy of a positive grade.
While a raw positive grade rate offers some insight, it doesn’t remotely represent the top 10 wide receivers from 2024, nor does it reflect the top 10 in terms of overall PFF grade. That stat doesn’t factor in the strength of each grade, frequency of negatively graded plays, target volume or the many layers of context required to complete the picture.
So, let’s apply a more nuanced lens: by weighting each positive grade — giving more value to +1.0, +1.5, and +2.0 plays over the more routine +0.5s — we get a much clearer view.
Here’s what the top 10 wide receivers look like based on weighted positive grade rate.
You can see the picture starting to shift — but only slightly. That’s because wide receiver grading is overwhelmingly driven by +0.5 plays, which made up just over 80% of the positive grades for the 88 receivers who saw at least 50 targets last season.
To better refine our signal, we’ll add one more critical component: target volume. Since receivers are only graded on targets (except for rare blocking situations), we now weight the previous metric using the square root of a receiver’s target count.
This adjustment maintains snaps as the denominator — preserving a measure of total on-field involvement — while scaling the result by how many actual graded opportunities a player had. The result? A clearer signal without losing context. Here’s what the top 10 looks like after applying that final layer.
We’re not at the full picture yet, but each layer brings us closer. By starting with raw positive grade rates, adjusting for grade strength, and scaling by target volume, we begin to spotlight receivers who consistently generate value — and do it at scale.
This is where grading evolves beyond a simple number into a more complete lens on performance.
Play-by-play grades: Wide receivers
This news was originally published on this post .
Be the first to leave a comment