
CHARLOTTE, N.C. — After two days of participating in a court-mandated settlement conference, NASCAR and the two teams suing the league, including one co-owned by NBA legend Michael Jordan, failed to reach terms to settle the protracted and contentious legal battle over the state of the sport’s charter system.
Advertisement
Although NASCAR and teams 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports did not find a way to end the antitrust lawsuit filed by the two teams against NASCAR and NASCAR chairman and CEO Jim France, the two days of settlement talks were among the most the parties engaged in discussions since the legal saga began last October.
23XI’s ownership group includes Jordan and current star NASCAR driver Denny Hamlin; Front Row is owned by Bob Jenkins, a restaurant entrepreneur who also owns several fast-food franchises. Jordan, Hamlin and Jenkins attended the sessions, as did France, NASCAR co-owner Lesa France Kennedy, NASCAR commissioner Steve Phelps, NASCAR president Steve O’Donnell, NASCAR vice chairman Mike Helton and NASCAR executive vice president Ben Kennedy. Also present was 23XI co-owner Curtis Polk.
The parties spent all of Tuesday and also Wednesday afternoon at the federal courthouse in downtown Charlotte; they were at an offsite location Wednesday morning.
The settlement conference was mandated by Kenneth Bell, the presiding judge in the case, with the hope of forcing the two sides to find common ground before the scheduled Dec. 1 trial date. Former NBA chief legal officer Jeffrey Mishkin served as mediator.
Tuesday, Jenkins described the opening day of discussions as “congenial” as he left the courthouse after the eight-hour session. Wednesday’s session also went eight hours.
Neither side offered a comment as they left the courthouse late Wednesday afternoon.
Denny Hamlin and Jeffrey Kessler, attorney for 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports, offered no comment leaving the courthouse. Summary judgment hearing remains scheduled for tomorrow. pic.twitter.com/Yqqy1NWeny
— Jordan Bianchi (@Jordan_Bianchi) October 22, 2025
With no settlement reached, the parties will be back in court Thursday morning for summary judgment related to various arguments by the legal teams in advance of the trial. A settlement still could also be reached at any time, including after the trial begins.
Advertisement
23XI and Front Row filed a joint federal lawsuit last fall against NASCAR and Jim France, alleging monopolistic practices stemming from two-plus years of tough negotiations to extend NASCAR’s charter agreement with teams that was set to expire after the 2024 season. Owning one of 36 available charters guarantees teams certain revenue in addition to a starting spot in every Cup Series points race.
After NASCAR made a last-minute, take-it-or-leave-it offer to the teams in September 2024, 13 of the 15 charter teams signed the accord. 23XI and Front Row refused and filed their lawsuit the next month.
While NASCAR, 23XI and Front Row engaged in discussions Tuesday, the Drivers Advisory Council announced it had requested to file a brief as amicus curiae in the case, a means for a party not involved in the lawsuit to provide additional insight on the situation. The DAC is a “voluntary association of NASCAR drivers whose mission is to represent and advocate for the drivers within the sport.”
NASCAR and the DAC have worked closely on several matters since the group’s 2022 formation. Former NASCAR driver Jeff Burton serves as the DAC director, and he’s been credited by NASCAR leadership for improving communication between the league and the drivers. Most recently, NASCAR and the DAC created a program that awards a monetary bonus to drivers who engage in activities to promote the sport.
With the impending mediation, the DAC is concerned any potential agreement regarding the charter structure or revenue in the sport will “impair the rights and interests of the drivers and threaten their overall security,” the brief read.
The DAC further notes in the brief that “any resolution in the case (1) protect the long term interests for existing and future drivers in the sport; (2) provide a permanent and meaningful position for drivers collectively to have an independent voice on important issues in the sport; and (3) for all parties to act in the best interest of the fans to provide the best experience possible.”
This news was originally published on this post .
Be the first to leave a comment